A dataset revealing high inter-designer disagreement on UI preferences motivates a sample-efficient method that personalizes generative interfaces by embedding new users in the space of prior designers, outperforming baselines in both modeling and user preference.
Bigham, and Jeffrey Nichols
2 Pith papers cite this work, alongside 2 external citations. Polarity classification is still indexing.
2
Pith papers citing it
2
external citations · external index
citation-role summary
method 1
citation-polarity summary
years
2026 2verdicts
UNVERDICTED 2roles
method 1polarities
use method 1representative citing papers
Users treat human delegation for long tasks as a flexible compass but AI delegation as rigid railway tracks due to perceived AI limitations in inference and judgment.
citing papers explorer
-
Efficient Personalization of Generative User Interfaces
A dataset revealing high inter-designer disagreement on UI preferences motivates a sample-efficient method that personalizes generative interfaces by embedding new users in the space of prior designers, outperforming baselines in both modeling and user preference.
-
Compass vs Railway Tracks: Unpacking User Mental Models for Communicating Long-Horizon Work to Humans vs. AI
Users treat human delegation for long tasks as a flexible compass but AI delegation as rigid railway tracks due to perceived AI limitations in inference and judgment.