An auditing framework using justified representation from social choice theory is developed to evaluate question slates in expert panel deliberations, including efficient algorithms and comparisons of moderator, ILP, and LLM selections on historical data.
The economic limits of permissionless consensus
3 Pith papers cite this work. Polarity classification is still indexing.
3
Pith papers citing it
verdicts
UNVERDICTED 3representative citing papers
Introduces the first compositional game-theoretic framework for blockchains using cross-layer games and cross-application composition to analyze incentive compatibility and reveal vulnerabilities in composed systems.
Wonderboom aggregates signatures from over two million validators in one Ethereum slot with stronger security guarantees against stake-shifting attacks than the existing protocol.
citing papers explorer
-
Question the Questions: Auditing Representation in Online Deliberative Processes
An auditing framework using justified representation from social choice theory is developed to evaluate question slates in expert panel deliberations, including efficient algorithms and comparisons of moderator, ILP, and LLM selections on historical data.
-
A Composable Game-Theoretic Framework for Blockchains
Introduces the first compositional game-theoretic framework for blockchains using cross-layer games and cross-application composition to analyze incentive compatibility and reveal vulnerabilities in composed systems.
-
Wonderboom -- Efficient, and Censorship-Resilient Signature Aggregation for Million Scale Consensus
Wonderboom aggregates signatures from over two million validators in one Ethereum slot with stronger security guarantees against stake-shifting attacks than the existing protocol.