Gated lexical shortcut connections added to the transformer yield 0.9 BLEU average gains on five WMT directions while lowering the lexical content stored in hidden states.
What do Neural Machine Translation Models Learn about Morphology?
1 Pith paper cite this work. Polarity classification is still indexing.
abstract
Neural machine translation (MT) models obtain state-of-the-art performance while maintaining a simple, end-to-end architecture. However, little is known about what these models learn about source and target languages during the training process. In this work, we analyze the representations learned by neural MT models at various levels of granularity and empirically evaluate the quality of the representations for learning morphology through extrinsic part-of-speech and morphological tagging tasks. We conduct a thorough investigation along several parameters: word-based vs. character-based representations, depth of the encoding layer, the identity of the target language, and encoder vs. decoder representations. Our data-driven, quantitative evaluation sheds light on important aspects in the neural MT system and its ability to capture word structure.
fields
cs.CL 1years
2019 1verdicts
CONDITIONAL 1representative citing papers
citing papers explorer
-
Widening the Representation Bottleneck in Neural Machine Translation with Lexical Shortcuts
Gated lexical shortcut connections added to the transformer yield 0.9 BLEU average gains on five WMT directions while lowering the lexical content stored in hidden states.