A dataset revealing high inter-designer disagreement on UI preferences motivates a sample-efficient method that personalizes generative interfaces by embedding new users in the space of prior designers, outperforming baselines in both modeling and user preference.
Title resolution pending
2 Pith papers cite this work. Polarity classification is still indexing.
2
Pith papers citing it
citation-role summary
background 1
citation-polarity summary
years
2026 2verdicts
UNVERDICTED 2roles
background 1polarities
unclear 1representative citing papers
A literature review concludes that pursuing consensus in data annotation creates biased AI by dismissing subjective disagreements and enforcing geographic hegemony, and proposes mapping diversity instead.
citing papers explorer
-
Efficient Personalization of Generative User Interfaces
A dataset revealing high inter-designer disagreement on UI preferences motivates a sample-efficient method that personalizes generative interfaces by embedding new users in the space of prior designers, outperforming baselines in both modeling and user preference.
-
The Consensus Trap: Dissecting Subjectivity and the "Ground Truth" Illusion in Data Annotation
A literature review concludes that pursuing consensus in data annotation creates biased AI by dismissing subjective disagreements and enforcing geographic hegemony, and proposes mapping diversity instead.