pith. sign in

Distance Priors from Planck Final Release

8 Pith papers cite this work. Polarity classification is still indexing.

8 Pith papers citing it
abstract

We present the distance priors from the finally released $Planck~ \textrm{TT,TE,EE}+\textrm{lowE}$ data in 2018. The uncertainties are around $40\%$ smaller than those from $Planck$ 2015 TT$+$lowP. In order to check the validity of these new distance priors, we adopt the distance priors to constrain the cosmological parameters in different dark energy models, including the $\Lambda$CDM model, the $w$CDM model and the CPL model, and conclude that the distance priors provide consistent constraints on the relevant cosmological parameters compared to those from the full $Planck$ 2018 data release.

citation-role summary

background 2

citation-polarity summary

years

2026 5 2025 3

roles

background 2

polarities

background 2

representative citing papers

Interacting Dark Sector field theory with phantom crossing

astro-ph.CO · 2026-05-19 · unverdicted · novelty 5.0

An interacting dark sector model with Yukawa-coupled fermionic DM and Born-Infeld tachyonic scalar produces recent double phantom crossing in effective w_DE, fits DESI+Planck+SN data, and predicts ultralight DM mass of order 1.9e-3 eV under naturalness assumptions.

Beyond CPL: Evidence for dynamical dark energy in three-parameter models

astro-ph.CO · 2025-10-04 · conditional · novelty 4.0

Two three-parameter extensions of the mAH dark energy parametrization are compared to LambdaCDM, wCDM, CPL and others using CMB, DESI BAO, H(z), RSD and three SNIa samples, yielding Delta chi-squared improvements of 6-38 and 2-5 sigma tensions with LambdaCDM.

Dark Energy in Ghost-free non-local Gravity

gr-qc · 2026-05-21 · unverdicted · novelty 3.0

Ghost-free non-local gravity fits Pantheon+, DESI, and H(z) data but fails with added CMB, while generalized exponential F(R) gravity outperforms Lambda CDM across all datasets including CMB.

citing papers explorer

Showing 8 of 8 citing papers.