pith. sign in

Title resolution pending

3 Pith papers cite this work. Polarity classification is still indexing.

3 Pith papers citing it

citation-role summary

background 1

citation-polarity summary

fields

cs.DB 2 cs.CL 1

years

2026 2 2025 1

verdicts

UNVERDICTED 3

roles

background 1

polarities

background 1

representative citing papers

Both Ends Count! Just How Good are LLM Agents at "Text-to-Big SQL"?

cs.DB · 2026-02-25 · unverdicted · novelty 7.0

New Text-to-Big SQL metrics show that LLM agents must balance accuracy with cost and speed at scale, where GPT-4o trades some accuracy for up to 12x speedup and GPT-5.2 proves more cost-effective than Gemini 3 Pro on large inputs.

Reasoning about Intent for Ambiguous Requests

cs.CL · 2025-11-13 · unverdicted · novelty 5.0

Reinforcement learning with a dual recall-precision reward trains models to enumerate valid interpretations and answers for ambiguous inputs using only multiple-answer supervision.

citing papers explorer

Showing 3 of 3 citing papers.

  • PrepBench: How Far Are We from Natural-Language-Driven Data Preparation? cs.DB · 2026-05-09 · unverdicted · none · ref 22

    PrepBench is a benchmark showing that state-of-the-art LLMs still struggle with natural-language-driven data preparation involving disambiguation, code generation, and workflow translation.

  • Both Ends Count! Just How Good are LLM Agents at "Text-to-Big SQL"? cs.DB · 2026-02-25 · unverdicted · none · ref 25

    New Text-to-Big SQL metrics show that LLM agents must balance accuracy with cost and speed at scale, where GPT-4o trades some accuracy for up to 12x speedup and GPT-5.2 proves more cost-effective than Gemini 3 Pro on large inputs.

  • Reasoning about Intent for Ambiguous Requests cs.CL · 2025-11-13 · unverdicted · none · ref 4

    Reinforcement learning with a dual recall-precision reward trains models to enumerate valid interpretations and answers for ambiguous inputs using only multiple-answer supervision.