Transformers outperformed young children and matched their error profile on a geometry odd-one-out task, while vision-language models underperformed vision-only models.
Human-Like Geometric Abstraction in Large Pre-trained Neural Networks
1 Pith paper cite this work. Polarity classification is still indexing.
abstract
Humans possess a remarkable capacity to recognize and manipulate abstract structure, which is especially apparent in the domain of geometry. Recent research in cognitive science suggests neural networks do not share this capacity, concluding that human geometric abilities come from discrete symbolic structure in human mental representations. However, progress in artificial intelligence (AI) suggests that neural networks begin to demonstrate more human-like reasoning after scaling up standard architectures in both model size and amount of training data. In this study, we revisit empirical results in cognitive science on geometric visual processing and identify three key biases in geometric visual processing: a sensitivity towards complexity, regularity, and the perception of parts and relations. We test tasks from the literature that probe these biases in humans and find that large pre-trained neural network models used in AI demonstrate more human-like abstract geometric processing.
fields
cs.CV 1years
2025 1verdicts
CONDITIONAL 1representative citing papers
citing papers explorer
-
Computer Vision Models Show Human-Like Sensitivity to Geometric and Topological Concepts
Transformers outperformed young children and matched their error profile on a geometry odd-one-out task, while vision-language models underperformed vision-only models.