pith. sign in

Can We Predict Before Executing Machine Learning Agents?

1 Pith paper cite this work. Polarity classification is still indexing.

1 Pith paper citing it
abstract

Autonomous machine learning agents have revolutionized scientific discovery, yet they remain constrained by a Generate-Execute-Feedback paradigm. Previous approaches suffer from a severe Execution Bottleneck, as hypothesis evaluation relies strictly on expensive physical execution. To bypass these physical constraints, we internalize execution priors to substitute costly runtime checks with instantaneous predictive reasoning, drawing inspiration from World Models. In this work, we formalize the task of Data-centric Solution Preference and construct a comprehensive corpus of 18,438 pairwise comparisons. We demonstrate that LLMs exhibit significant predictive capabilities when primed with a Verified Data Analysis Report, achieving 61.5% accuracy and robust confidence calibration. Finally, we instantiate this framework in FOREAGENT, an agent that employs a Predict-then-Verify loop, achieving a 6x acceleration in convergence while surpassing execution-based baselines by +6%. Our code and dataset are publicly available at https://github.com/zjunlp/predict-before-execute.

fields

cs.NE 1

years

2026 1

verdicts

UNVERDICTED 1

representative citing papers

What Do Evolutionary Coding Agents Evolve?

cs.NE · 2026-05-19 · unverdicted · novelty 7.0

Evolutionary coding agents achieve most benchmark gains through a small subset of edit types and by cycling previously deleted code lines rather than developing new algorithmic structures.

citing papers explorer

Showing 1 of 1 citing paper.

  • What Do Evolutionary Coding Agents Evolve? cs.NE · 2026-05-19 · unverdicted · none · ref 64 · internal anchor

    Evolutionary coding agents achieve most benchmark gains through a small subset of edit types and by cycling previously deleted code lines rather than developing new algorithmic structures.