GPT-assisted adversarial retraining restores LinkedIn fake-profile detectors from a 42-52 percent false accept rate on AI-written profiles to 1-7 percent.
Identifying Fake Profiles in LinkedIn
1 Pith paper cite this work. Polarity classification is still indexing.
abstract
As organizations increasingly rely on professionally oriented networks such as LinkedIn (the largest such social network) for building business connections, there is increasing value in having one's profile noticed within the network. As this value increases, so does the temptation to misuse the network for unethical purposes. Fake profiles have an adverse effect on the trustworthiness of the network as a whole, and can represent significant costs in time and effort in building a connection based on fake information. Unfortunately, fake profiles are difficult to identify. Approaches have been proposed for some social networks; however, these generally rely on data that are not publicly available for LinkedIn profiles. In this research, we identify the minimal set of profile data necessary for identifying fake profiles in LinkedIn, and propose an appropriate data mining approach for fake profile identification. We demonstrate that, even with limited profile data, our approach can identify fake profiles with 87% accuracy and 94% True Negative Rate, which is comparable to the results obtained based on larger data sets and more expansive profile information. Further, when compared to approaches using similar amounts and types of data, our method provides an improvement of approximately 14% accuracy.
citation-role summary
citation-polarity summary
fields
cs.SI 1years
2025 1verdicts
CONDITIONAL 1roles
background 1polarities
background 1representative citing papers
citing papers explorer
-
Weak Links in LinkedIn: Enhancing Fake Profile Detection in the Age of LLMs
GPT-assisted adversarial retraining restores LinkedIn fake-profile detectors from a 42-52 percent false accept rate on AI-written profiles to 1-7 percent.