CADEngBench, a layered benchmark of 600 parametric tasks and 120 assembly pairs, shows current AI models edit supplied CAD far more easily than they generate it, and rarely match reference physics or recover exact assembly joints.
ASAP: Automated Sequence Planning for Complex Robotic Assembly with Physical Feasibility
1 Pith paper cite this work. Polarity classification is still indexing.
abstract
The automated assembly of complex products requires a system that can automatically plan a physically feasible sequence of actions for assembling many parts together. In this paper, we present ASAP, a physics-based planning approach for automatically generating such a sequence for general-shaped assemblies. ASAP accounts for gravity to design a sequence where each sub-assembly is physically stable with a limited number of parts being held and a support surface. We apply efficient tree search algorithms to reduce the combinatorial complexity of determining such an assembly sequence. The search can be guided by either geometric heuristics or graph neural networks trained on data with simulation labels. Finally, we show the superior performance of ASAP at generating physically realistic assembly sequence plans on a large dataset of hundreds of complex product assemblies. We further demonstrate the applicability of ASAP on both simulation and real-world robotic setups. Project website: asap.csail.mit.edu
citation-role summary
citation-polarity summary
fields
cs.AI 1years
2026 1verdicts
CONDITIONAL 1roles
background 1polarities
background 1representative citing papers
citing papers explorer
-
CADEngBench: It Looks Like CAD, but Does It Work? Evaluating Parametric Design, Assembly Reasoning, and Physics Simulation
CADEngBench, a layered benchmark of 600 parametric tasks and 120 assembly pairs, shows current AI models edit supplied CAD far more easily than they generate it, and rarely match reference physics or recover exact assembly joints.