The paper introduces an execution-validated benchmark for pull-request queue governance and reports that top models reach 66.6% relational delivery yet only 8 of 324 runs deliver an entire queue exactly.
ChainSWE: Benchmarking Coding Agents on Multi-Bug Software Maintenance
1 Pith paper cite this work. Polarity classification is still indexing.
abstract
Language model (LM) agents are increasingly deployed to maintain codebases over extended periods, fixing streams of related defects while carrying context from one fix to the next. Yet existing software engineering (SWE) benchmarks evaluate models one bug at a time: the repository is reset, the codebase is re-read, and a single self-contained issue is graded in isolation. This setting collapses a continuous maintenance workflow into a series of independent sessions, ignoring the cumulative dependencies that make real-world bug fixing challenging. To bridge this gap, we introduce ChainSWE, the first benchmark for evaluating agents on sequential, dependent bug fixes within a shared codebase. We collect chronological chains of 304 issues across 54 Python projects, mined from six SWE-bench-family datasets. Our evaluation across a range of agents and models reveals a consistent performance drop by up to 70% as the chain length increases.
citation-role summary
citation-polarity summary
fields
cs.SE 1years
2026 1verdicts
CONDITIONAL 1roles
dataset 1polarities
use dataset 1representative citing papers
citing papers explorer
-
BulkPR-Bench: Benchmarking Queue-Level Governance of Interacting Pull Requests
The paper introduces an execution-validated benchmark for pull-request queue governance and reports that top models reach 66.6% relational delivery yet only 8 of 324 runs deliver an entire queue exactly.