The authors show that SRG evolution makes a fitted pi-pi potential band-diagonal, but they do not verify that the evolved potential reproduces the original phase shifts.
On the precision of the theoretical predictions for pi pi scattering
1 Pith paper cite this work. Polarity classification is still indexing.
abstract
In a recent paper, Pelaez and Yndurain evaluate some of the low energy observables of pi pi scattering and obtain flat disagreement with our earlier results. The authors work with unsubtracted dispersion relations, so that their results are very sensitive to the poorly known high energy behaviour of the scattering amplitude. They claim that the asymptotic representation we used is incorrect and propose an alternative one. We repeat their calculations on the basis of the standard, subtracted fixed-t dispersion relations, using their asymptotics. The outcome fully confirms our earlier findings. Moreover, we show that the Regge parametrization proposed by these authors for the region above 1.4 GeV violates crossing symmetry: Their ansatz is not consistent with the behaviour observed at low energies.
fields
hep-ph 1years
2019 1verdicts
CONDITIONAL 1representative citing papers
citing papers explorer
-
$\pi\pi$ scattering from a similarity renormalization group perspective
The authors show that SRG evolution makes a fitted pi-pi potential band-diagonal, but they do not verify that the evolved potential reproduces the original phase shifts.