A zero-shot, prompt-engineered GPT-4 system can grade open-ended statistics homework and produce personalized feedback, but the evidence that it improves learning over traditional grading is limited by the survey design.
Can an AI-tool grade assignments in an introductory physics course?
1 Pith paper cite this work. Polarity classification is still indexing.
abstract
Problem solving is an integral part of any physics curriculum, and most physics instructors would likely agree that the associated learner competencies are best assessed by considering the solution path: not only the final solution matters, but also how the learner arrived there. Unfortunately, providing meaningful feedback on written derivations is much more labor and resource intensive than only grading the outcome: currently, the latter can be done by computer, while the former involves handwritten solutions that need to be graded by humans. This exploratory study proposes an AI-assisted workflow for grading written physics-problem solutions, and it evaluates the viability of the actual grading step using GPT-4. It is found that the AI-tool is capable of providing feedback that can be helpful in formative assessment scenarios, but that for summative scenarios, particularly those that are high-stakes, it should only be used for an initial round of grading that sorts and flags solution approaches.
fields
cs.CY 1years
2025 1verdicts
CONDITIONAL 1representative citing papers
citing papers explorer
-
A Zero-Shot LLM Framework for Automatic Assignment Grading in Higher Education
A zero-shot, prompt-engineered GPT-4 system can grade open-ended statistics homework and produce personalized feedback, but the evidence that it improves learning over traditional grading is limited by the survey design.