A cross-lingual QA framework shows users build stronger mental models of MT systems through practice and source language knowledge mainly by spotting surface-level errors, with transcriptions helping further.
Explanation in Artificial Intelligence: Insights from the Social Sciences
2 Pith papers cite this work. Polarity classification is still indexing.
2
Pith papers citing it
abstract
There has been a recent resurgence in the area of explainable artificial intelligence as researchers and practitioners seek to make their algorithms more understandable. Much of this research is focused on explicitly explaining decisions or actions to a human observer, and it should not be controversial to say that looking at how humans explain to each other can serve as a useful starting point for explanation in artificial intelligence. However, it is fair to say that most work in explainable artificial intelligence uses only the researchers' intuition of what constitutes a `good' explanation. There exists vast and valuable bodies of research in philosophy, psychology, and cognitive science of how people define, generate, select, evaluate, and present explanations, which argues that people employ certain cognitive biases and social expectations towards the explanation process. This paper argues that the field of explainable artificial intelligence should build on this existing research, and reviews relevant papers from philosophy, cognitive psychology/science, and social psychology, which study these topics. It draws out some important findings, and discusses ways that these can be infused with work on explainable artificial intelligence.
fields
cs.CL 2representative citing papers
The authors provide a detailed taxonomy of 21 risks associated with language models, covering discrimination, information leaks, misinformation, malicious applications, interaction harms, and societal impacts like job loss and environmental costs.
citing papers explorer
-
Measuring User's Mental Models of Speech Translation in Human-AI Collaboration
A cross-lingual QA framework shows users build stronger mental models of MT systems through practice and source language knowledge mainly by spotting surface-level errors, with transcriptions helping further.
-
Ethical and social risks of harm from Language Models
The authors provide a detailed taxonomy of 21 risks associated with language models, covering discrimination, information leaks, misinformation, malicious applications, interaction harms, and societal impacts like job loss and environmental costs.