A consumer-laptop benchmark shows CUDA matrix multiplication outpacing a naive sequential C++ baseline by up to 593x, but the claimed shared-memory optimization is absent from the supplied code.
Performance Analysis and Efficient Execution on Systems with multi-core CPUs, GPUs and MICs
1 Pith paper cite this work. Polarity classification is still indexing.
abstract
We carry out a comparative performance study of multi-core CPUs, GPUs and Intel Xeon Phi (Many Integrated Core - MIC) with a microscopy image analysis application. We experimentally evaluate the performance of computing devices on core operations of the application. We correlate the observed performance with the characteristics of computing devices and data access patterns, computation complexities, and parallelization forms of the operations. The results show a significant variability in the performance of operations with respect to the device used. The performances of operations with regular data access are comparable or sometimes better on a MIC than that on a GPU. GPUs are more efficient than MICs for operations that access data irregularly, because of the lower bandwidth of the MIC for random data accesses. We propose new performance-aware scheduling strategies that consider variabilities in operation speedups. Our scheduling strategies significantly improve application performance compared to classic strategies in hybrid configurations.
citation-role summary
citation-polarity summary
fields
cs.DC 1years
2025 1verdicts
REJECT 1roles
background 1polarities
unclear 1representative citing papers
citing papers explorer
-
Accelerating Matrix Multiplication: A Performance Comparison Between Multi-Core CPU and GPU
A consumer-laptop benchmark shows CUDA matrix multiplication outpacing a naive sequential C++ baseline by up to 593x, but the claimed shared-memory optimization is absent from the supplied code.