Pith. sign in

Canonical transformations and squeezing formalism in cosmology

1 Pith paper cite this work. Polarity classification is still indexing.

1 Pith paper citing it
abstract

Canonical transformations are ubiquitous in Hamiltonian mechanics, since they not only describe the fundamental invariance of the theory under phase-space reparameterisations, but also generate the dynamics of the system. In the first part of this work we study the symplectic structure associated with linear canonical transformations. After reviewing salient mathematical properties of the symplectic group in a pedagogical way, we introduce the squeezing formalism, and show how any linear dynamics can be cast in terms of an invariant representation. In the second part, we apply these results to the case of cosmological perturbations, and focus on scalar field fluctuations during inflation. We show that different canonical variables select out different vacuum states, and that this leaves an ambiguity in observational predictions if initial conditions are set at a finite time in the past. We also discuss how the effectiveness of the quantum-to-classical transition of cosmological perturbations depends on the set of canonical variables used to describe them.

citation-role summary

background 1

citation-polarity summary

fields

gr-qc 1

years

2025 1

verdicts

CONDITIONAL 1

roles

background 1

polarities

unclear 1

representative citing papers

Inflationary Decoherence from the Gravitational Floor

gr-qc · 2025-09-09 · conditional · novelty 6.0

Gravitational self-interactions alone decohere super-Hubble inflationary fluctuations with purity loss growing as (aH/k)^5, faster than the a^3 growth of earlier calculations.

citing papers explorer

Showing 1 of 1 citing paper.

  • Inflationary Decoherence from the Gravitational Floor gr-qc · 2025-09-09 · conditional · none · ref 113 · internal anchor

    Gravitational self-interactions alone decohere super-Hubble inflationary fluctuations with purity loss growing as (aH/k)^5, faster than the a^3 growth of earlier calculations.