Pith. sign in

Late-time cosmology in a model of modified gravity with an exponential function of the curvature

1 Pith paper cite this work. Polarity classification is still indexing.

1 Pith paper citing it
abstract

In this work, we analyse the late-time evolution of the universe for a particular $f(R)$ gravity model built from an exponential function of the scalar curvature. Following the literature, we write the field equations in terms of a suited statefinder function ($y_H(z)$) and considering well motivated physical initial conditions, the resulting equations are solved numerically. Also, the cosmological parameters $w_{\rm{DE}}$, $w_{\rm{eff}}$, $\Omega_{\rm{DE}}$ and $H(z)$ and the statefinder quantities $q$, $j$, $s$ and $Om(z)$ are explicitly expressed in terms of $y_H(z)$ and its derivatives. Furthermore, setting an appropriate set of values for the model parameters, the cosmological parameters as well as the statefinder quantities are plotted, and their present values (at $z=0$), are shown to be compatible with Planck 2018 observations and the $\Lambda$CDM-model values. Considering updated measurements from the dynamics of the expansion of the universe, $H(z)$, we perform an statistical analysis to constrain the free parameters of the model, finding a particular set of values that fit the data well and predict acceptable values for the cosmological and statefinder parameters at present time. Therefore, the $f(R)$ gravity model is found to be consistent with the considered observational data, and a viable alternative to explain the late-time acceleration of the universe.

citation-role summary

background 1

citation-polarity summary

fields

gr-qc 1

years

2024 1

verdicts

REJECT 1

roles

background 1

polarities

unclear 1

representative citing papers

Modified gravity/Dynamical Dark Energy vs $\Lambda$CDM: is the game over?

gr-qc · 2024-12-12 · reject · novelty 4.0

An AIC/χ² comparison of exponential F(R) gravity, wCDM, and CPL models against Pantheon+, DESI DR1, cosmic chronometer, and Planck-compressed data claims ΛCDM is excluded at 4σ, but the significance conversion is not statistically justified.

citing papers explorer

Showing 1 of 1 citing paper.

  • Modified gravity/Dynamical Dark Energy vs $\Lambda$CDM: is the game over? gr-qc · 2024-12-12 · reject · none · ref 23 · internal anchor

    An AIC/χ² comparison of exponential F(R) gravity, wCDM, and CPL models against Pantheon+, DESI DR1, cosmic chronometer, and Planck-compressed data claims ΛCDM is excluded at 4σ, but the significance conversion is not statistically justified.