Across 358 behavioral-science meta-analyses, outlier-handling treatments changed the significance verdict in 11.5% and the smallest-effect-size verdict in 15.9% of meta-analyses, while leaving the mean effect almost unchanged.
Estimating the Change in Meta-Analytic Effect Size Estimates After the Application of Publication Bias Adjustment Methods
1 Pith paper cite this work, alongside 19 external citations. Polarity classification is still indexing.
1
Pith paper citing it
19
external citations · OpenAlex
fields
econ.EM 1years
2026 1verdicts
ACCEPT 1representative citing papers
citing papers explorer
-
Do decisions about outliers and influential effects matter? Evidence from 358 behavioral science meta-analyses
Across 358 behavioral-science meta-analyses, outlier-handling treatments changed the significance verdict in 11.5% and the smallest-effect-size verdict in 15.9% of meta-analyses, while leaving the mean effect almost unchanged.