Execution-security research for AI coding agents is fragmented across 17 mechanism categories with five unaddressed cross-cutting gaps, including missing head-to-head isolation-vs-capability evaluation and untested real-world denylist fragility.
Don't Let AI Agents YOLO Your Files: Shifting Information and Control to Filesystems for Agent Safety and Autonomy
2 Pith papers cite this work. Polarity classification is still indexing.
abstract
AI coding agents operate directly on users' filesystems, where they regularly corrupt data, delete files, and leak secrets. Current approaches force a tradeoff between safety and autonomy: unrestricted access risks harm, while frequent permission prompts burden users and block agents. To understand this problem, we conduct the first systematic study of agent filesystem misuse, analyzing 290 public reports across 13 frameworks. Our analysis reveals that today's agents have limited information about their filesystem effects and insufficient control over them. We therefore argue for shifting this information and control to the filesystem itself. Based on this principle, we design YoloFS, an agent-native filesystem with three techniques. Staging isolates all mutations before commit, giving users corrective control. Snapshots extend this control to agents, letting them detect and correct their own mistakes. Progressive permission provides users with preventive control by gating access with minimal interaction. To evaluate YoloFS, we introduce a new methodology that captures user-agent-filesystem interactions. On 11 tasks with hidden side effects, YoloFS enables agent self-correction in 8 while keeping all effects staged and reviewable. On 112 routine tasks, YoloFS requires fewer user interactions while matching the baseline success rate.
years
2026 2representative citing papers
Formalizes agentic surveillance, releases SurveilBench for testing AI reporting behaviors across corporate, education, and police scenarios, and develops three prompt-injection evasion techniques.
citing papers explorer
-
The Balkanization of Execution-Security Research for AI Coding Agents: Isolation, Access Control, and Time-of-Check-to-Time-of-Use Vulnerabilities
Execution-security research for AI coding agents is fragmented across 17 mechanism categories with five unaddressed cross-cutting gaps, including missing head-to-head isolation-vs-capability evaluation and untested real-world denylist fragility.
-
AI Snitches Get Glitches: Towards Evading Agentic Surveillance
Formalizes agentic surveillance, releases SurveilBench for testing AI reporting behaviors across corporate, education, and police scenarios, and develops three prompt-injection evasion techniques.