Gil Kalai argues that NISQ devices are computationally weak enough that quantum supremacy and quantum error correction will both fail.
Arrow, A difficulty in the theory of social welfare, Journal of Political Economy 58 (1950) , 328–346
1 Pith paper cite this work. Polarity classification is still indexing.
1
Pith paper citing it
fields
quant-ph 1years
2019 1verdicts
CONDITIONAL 1representative citing papers
citing papers explorer
-
The Argument against Quantum Computers
Gil Kalai argues that NISQ devices are computationally weak enough that quantum supremacy and quantum error correction will both fail.