The paper formulates LLM-as-judge evaluation as a two-stage missing-data problem and derives sample-size formulas via doubly robust estimators to achieve desired power while allocating more human reviews where LLM predictability is low.
arXiv preprint arXiv:2602.12992 , year=
1 Pith paper cite this work. Polarity classification is still indexing.
1
Pith paper citing it
fields
cs.LG 1years
2026 1verdicts
UNVERDICTED 1representative citing papers
citing papers explorer
-
Augmenting Human Evaluation with LLM Judges: How Many Human Reviews Do You Need?
The paper formulates LLM-as-judge evaluation as a two-stage missing-data problem and derives sample-size formulas via doubly robust estimators to achieve desired power while allocating more human reviews where LLM predictability is low.