Pith. sign in

Detecting AI-generated Artwork

1 Pith paper cite this work. Polarity classification is still indexing.

1 Pith paper citing it
abstract

The high efficiency and quality of artwork generated by Artificial Intelligence (AI) has created new concerns and challenges for human artists. In particular, recent improvements in generative AI have made it difficult for people to distinguish between human-generated and AI-generated art. In this research, we consider the potential utility of various types of Machine Learning (ML) and Deep Learning (DL) models in distinguishing AI-generated artwork from human-generated artwork. We focus on three challenging artistic styles, namely, baroque, cubism, and expressionism. The learning models we test are Logistic Regression (LR), Support Vector Machine (SVM), Multilayer Perceptron (MLP), and Convolutional Neural Network (CNN). Our best experimental results yield a multiclass accuracy of 0.8208 over six classes, and an impressive accuracy of 0.9758 for the binary classification problem of distinguishing AI-generated from human-generated art.

fields

cs.CV 1

years

2026 1

verdicts

CONDITIONAL 1

representative citing papers

citing papers explorer

Showing 1 of 1 citing paper.

  • Robustness of AI-Art Detectors under Generator Shift cs.CV · 2026-08-12 · conditional · none · ref 26 · internal anchor

    AI-art detectors trained on LDM and SD2.1 artwork miss 42% to 58% of Stable Diffusion 3.5 Medium images in a zero-shot cross-generator test.