Strategic selection of LLMs and reasoning effort optimizes automated scoring accuracy and cost more effectively than self-consistency ensembling.
We did not, however, compare self-consistency against a single judge or other ensemble sizes
1 Pith paper cite this work. Polarity classification is still indexing.
1
Pith paper citing it
fields
cs.CY 1years
2026 1verdicts
UNVERDICTED 1representative citing papers
citing papers explorer
-
The Impact of LLM Self-Consistency and Reasoning Effort on Automated Scoring Accuracy and Cost
Strategic selection of LLMs and reasoning effort optimizes automated scoring accuracy and cost more effectively than self-consistency ensembling.