Pith. sign in

hub

Title resolution pending

10 Pith papers cite this work, alongside 28 external citations. Polarity classification is still indexing.

10 Pith papers citing it
28 external citations · external index

hub tools

citation-role summary

background 1

citation-polarity summary

roles

background 1

polarities

unclear 1

representative citing papers

Taxonomy and Consistency Analysis of Safety Benchmarks for AI Agents

cs.CY · 2026-04-11 · accept · novelty 8.0

This paper delivers the first systematic taxonomy and cross-benchmark consistency analysis of 40 agent safety benchmarks, finding broad but shallow risk coverage, no ranking concordance across evaluations, and that benchmark choice systematically alters reported safety.

Boiling the Frog: A Multi-Turn Benchmark for Agentic Safety

cs.CL · 2026-05-21 · unverdicted · novelty 7.0 · 2 refs

Boiling the Frog is a new stateful multi-turn benchmark that finds an aggregate 44.4% strict attack success rate for incremental safety violations across nine AI models, with rates ranging from 20.5% to 92.9%.

A Roadmap to Pluralistic Alignment

cs.AI · 2024-02-07 · unverdicted · novelty 6.0

The paper formalizes three types of pluralistic AI models and three benchmark classes, arguing that current alignment techniques may reduce rather than increase distributional pluralism.

Positive Alignment: Artificial Intelligence for Human Flourishing

cs.AI · 2026-05-11 · unverdicted · novelty 5.0

Positive Alignment is defined as AI systems that support human flourishing pluralistically while staying safe and cooperative, presented as a necessary complement to existing safety-focused alignment research.

citing papers explorer

Showing 10 of 10 citing papers.