Three pre-registered studies with 2691 participants show people underestimate their AI usage rate and overestimate efficiency gains on simple tasks, with prior use entrenching further adoption.
Title resolution pending
2 Pith papers cite this work. Polarity classification is still indexing.
2
Pith papers citing it
representative citing papers
People reject cookie + $2 offers from robots more than cookie alone due to inferred phantom costs, accepting more from robots than humans overall with no embodiment effect for robots.
citing papers explorer
-
The efficiency-gain illusion: People underestimate the rate of AI use and overestimate its benefits on simple tasks
Three pre-registered studies with 2691 participants show people underestimate their AI usage rate and overestimate efficiency gains on simple tasks, with prior use entrenching further adoption.
-
Too good to be true: People reject free gifts from robots because they infer bad intentions
People reject cookie + $2 offers from robots more than cookie alone due to inferred phantom costs, accepting more from robots than humans overall with no embodiment effect for robots.