Pith. sign in

Learning and Evaluating General Linguistic Intelligence

4 Pith papers cite this work. Polarity classification is still indexing.

4 Pith papers citing it
abstract

We define general linguistic intelligence as the ability to reuse previously acquired knowledge about a language's lexicon, syntax, semantics, and pragmatic conventions to adapt to new tasks quickly. Using this definition, we analyze state-of-the-art natural language understanding models and conduct an extensive empirical investigation to evaluate them against these criteria through a series of experiments that assess the task-independence of the knowledge being acquired by the learning process. In addition to task performance, we propose a new evaluation metric based on an online encoding of the test data that quantifies how quickly an existing agent (model) learns a new task. Our results show that while the field has made impressive progress in terms of model architectures that generalize to many tasks, these models still require a lot of in-domain training examples (e.g., for fine tuning, training task-specific modules), and are prone to catastrophic forgetting. Moreover, we find that far from solving general tasks (e.g., document question answering), our models are overfitting to the quirks of particular datasets (e.g., SQuAD). We discuss missing components and conjecture on how to make progress toward general linguistic intelligence.

citation-role summary

background 1

citation-polarity summary

fields

cs.CL 4

roles

background 1

polarities

unclear 1

representative citing papers

Language Models are Few-Shot Learners

cs.CL · 2020-05-28 · accept · novelty 8.0

GPT-3 shows that scaling an autoregressive language model to 175 billion parameters enables strong few-shot performance across diverse NLP tasks via in-context prompting without fine-tuning.

Language Models as Knowledge Bases?

cs.CL · 2019-09-03 · accept · novelty 7.0

BERT stores relational knowledge extractable via cloze queries without fine-tuning and matches supervised baselines on open-domain QA tasks.

citing papers explorer

Showing 4 of 4 citing papers.