Certifying a model only on a fixed audit dataset is vulnerable to data-forging; committing before sampling fresh audit data restores distributional security.
P2NIA: Privacy-Preserving Non-Iterative Auditing
1 Pith paper cite this work. Polarity classification is still indexing.
abstract
The emergence of AI legislation has increased the need to assess the ethical compliance of high-risk AI systems. Traditional auditing methods rely on platforms' application programming interfaces (APIs), where responses to queries are examined through the lens of fairness requirements. However, such approaches put a significant burden on platforms, as they are forced to maintain APIs while ensuring privacy, facing the possibility of data leaks. This lack of proper collaboration between the two parties, in turn, causes a significant challenge to the auditor, who is subject to estimation bias as they are unaware of the data distribution of the platform. To address these two issues, we present P2NIA, a novel auditing scheme that proposes a mutually beneficial collaboration for both the auditor and the platform. Extensive experiments demonstrate P2NIA's effectiveness in addressing both issues. In summary, our work introduces a privacy-preserving and non-iterative audit scheme that enhances fairness assessments using synthetic or local data, avoiding the challenges associated with traditional API-based audits.
fields
cs.CR 1years
2026 1verdicts
ACCEPT 1representative citing papers
citing papers explorer
-
Certified in Theory, Broken in Practice: Assumption Gaps in Cryptographic Model Certification
Certifying a model only on a fixed audit dataset is vulnerable to data-forging; committing before sampling fresh audit data restores distributional security.