Pith. sign in

Contrarian Incentives and Costly Social Learning

1 Pith paper cite this work. Polarity classification is still indexing.

1 Pith paper citing it
abstract

We study sequential social learning when agents pay a fixed cost for private information and prefer less popular actions. Actions taken without new information leave beliefs unchanged but alter popularity and subsequent decision cutoffs, potentially restarting acquisition. In a binary-signal benchmark, we characterize the restart region and show that public log odds at information dates form a stopped random walk. Contrarian incentives initially expand this region and weakly improve terminal beliefs and action accuracy in discrete steps. After the region reaches an intrinsic information-cost frontier, beliefs stop improving; beyond a second threshold, the long-run frequency of correct actions declines toward one half. For general experiment menus, any positive fixed fee uniformly bounds expected purchases and, with full-support signals, implies incomplete learning. The restart mechanism extends to recency-weighted popularity indices and to endogenous Gaussian precision.

fields

econ.TH 1

years

2025 1

verdicts

REJECT 1

representative citing papers

Paying for Failure in Expert Advice

econ.TH · 2025-08-27 · reject · novelty 4.0

Higher reputation can make experts recommend risky actions less often, but the paper's key condition is assumed rather than derived, and its single-cutoff characterization is not proven for different ability types.

citing papers explorer

Showing 1 of 1 citing paper.

  • Paying for Failure in Expert Advice econ.TH · 2025-08-27 · reject · none · ref 11 · internal anchor

    Higher reputation can make experts recommend risky actions less often, but the paper's key condition is assumed rather than derived, and its single-cutoff characterization is not proven for different ability types.