Higher reputation can make experts recommend risky actions less often, but the paper's key condition is assumed rather than derived, and its single-cutoff characterization is not proven for different ability types.
Contrarian Incentives and Costly Social Learning
1 Pith paper cite this work. Polarity classification is still indexing.
abstract
We study sequential social learning when agents pay a fixed cost for private information and prefer less popular actions. Actions taken without new information leave beliefs unchanged but alter popularity and subsequent decision cutoffs, potentially restarting acquisition. In a binary-signal benchmark, we characterize the restart region and show that public log odds at information dates form a stopped random walk. Contrarian incentives initially expand this region and weakly improve terminal beliefs and action accuracy in discrete steps. After the region reaches an intrinsic information-cost frontier, beliefs stop improving; beyond a second threshold, the long-run frequency of correct actions declines toward one half. For general experiment menus, any positive fixed fee uniformly bounds expected purchases and, with full-support signals, implies incomplete learning. The restart mechanism extends to recency-weighted popularity indices and to endogenous Gaussian precision.
fields
econ.TH 1years
2025 1verdicts
REJECT 1representative citing papers
citing papers explorer
-
Paying for Failure in Expert Advice
Higher reputation can make experts recommend risky actions less often, but the paper's key condition is assumed rather than derived, and its single-cutoff characterization is not proven for different ability types.