Pith. sign in

Regret Bounds for Discounted MDPs

1 Pith paper cite this work. Polarity classification is still indexing.

1 Pith paper citing it
abstract

Reinforcement learning (RL) has traditionally been understood from an episodic perspective; the concept of non-episodic RL, where there is no restart and therefore no reliable recovery, remains elusive. A fundamental question in non-episodic RL is how to measure the performance of a learner and derive algorithms to maximize such performance. Conventional wisdom is to maximize the difference between the average reward received by the learner and the maximal long-term average reward. In this paper, we argue that if the total time budget is relatively limited compared to the complexity of the environment, such comparison may fail to reflect the finite-time optimality of the learner. We propose a family of measures, called $\gamma$-regret, which we believe to better capture the finite-time optimality. We give motivations and derive lower and upper bounds for such measures. Note: A follow-up work (arXiv:2010.00587) has improved both our lower and upper bound, the gap is now closed at $\tilde{\Theta}\left(\frac{\sqrt{SAT}}{(1 - \gamma)^{\frac{1}{2}}}\right)$.

citation-role summary

background 1

citation-polarity summary

fields

cs.LG 1

years

2025 1

verdicts

REJECT 1

roles

background 1

polarities

background 1

representative citing papers

citing papers explorer

Showing 1 of 1 citing paper.