Pith. sign in

Social Debiasing for Fair Multi-modal LLMs

1 Pith paper cite this work. Polarity classification is still indexing.

1 Pith paper citing it
abstract

Multi-modal Large Language Models (MLLMs) have dramatically advanced the research field and delivered powerful vision-language understanding capabilities. However, these models often inherit deep-rooted social biases from their training data, leading to uncomfortable responses with respect to attributes such as race and gender. This paper addresses the issue of social biases in MLLMs by i) introducing a comprehensive counterfactual dataset with multiple social concepts (CMSC), which complements existing datasets by providing 18 diverse and balanced social concepts; and ii) proposing a counter-stereotype debiasing (CSD) strategy that mitigates social biases in MLLMs by leveraging the opposites of prevalent stereotypes. CSD incorporates both a novel bias-aware data sampling method and a loss rescaling method, enabling the model to effectively reduce biases. We conduct extensive experiments with four prevalent MLLM architectures. The results demonstrate the advantage of the CMSC dataset and the edge of CSD strategy in reducing social biases compared to existing competing methods, without compromising the overall performance on general multi-modal reasoning benchmarks.

fields

cs.LG 1

years

2025 1

verdicts

REJECT 1

representative citing papers

Fair Deepfake Detectors Can Generalize

cs.LG · 2025-07-03 · reject · novelty 5.0

The paper argues that demographic fairness interventions can causally improve cross-domain generalization in deepfake detection and introduces DAID to achieve both, but the causal evidence is flawed.

citing papers explorer

Showing 1 of 1 citing paper.

  • Fair Deepfake Detectors Can Generalize cs.LG · 2025-07-03 · reject · none · ref 10 · internal anchor

    The paper argues that demographic fairness interventions can causally improve cross-domain generalization in deepfake detection and introduces DAID to achieve both, but the causal evidence is flawed.