Pith. sign in

On Quorum Sizes in DAG-Based BFT Protocols

1 Pith paper cite this work. Polarity classification is still indexing.

1 Pith paper citing it
abstract

Several prominent DAG-based blockchain protocols, such as DAG-Rider, Tusk, and Bullshark, completely separate between equivocation elimination and committing; equivocation is handled through the use of a reliable Byzantine broadcast black-box protocol, while committing is handled by an independent DAG-based protocol. With such an architecture, a natural question that we study in this paper is whether the DAG protocol would work when the number of nodes (or validators) is only $2f+1$ (when equivocation is eliminated), and whether there are benefits in working with larger number of nodes, i.e., a total of $kf+1$ nodes for $k > 3$. We find that while DAG-Rider's correctness is maintained with $2f+1$ nodes, the asynchronous versions of both Tusk and Bullshark inherently depends on having $3f+1$ nodes, regardless of equivocation. We also explore the impact of having larger number of nodes on the expected termination time of these three protocols.

citation-role summary

background 1

citation-polarity summary

fields

cs.DC 1

years

2025 1

verdicts

CONDITIONAL 1

roles

background 1

polarities

unclear 1

representative citing papers

Not eXactly Byzantine: Efficient and Resilient TEE-Based State Machine Replication

cs.DC · 2025-01-19 · conditional · novelty 6.0

NxBFT is a TEE-based, asynchronous, leaderless DAG consensus protocol that achieves the highest throughput in the authors' comparison against MinBFT and Chained-Damysus for up to 40 replicas, at the cost of higher latency and a trust model where operators do not attack their own TEEs.

citing papers explorer

Showing 1 of 1 citing paper.

  • Not eXactly Byzantine: Efficient and Resilient TEE-Based State Machine Replication cs.DC · 2025-01-19 · conditional · none · ref 31 · internal anchor

    NxBFT is a TEE-based, asynchronous, leaderless DAG consensus protocol that achieves the highest throughput in the authors' comparison against MinBFT and Chained-Damysus for up to 40 replicas, at the cost of higher latency and a trust model where operators do not attack their own TEEs.