A systematic comparison finds that differentiable neurosymbolic systems offer better assurance mainly in arithmetic-like reasoning tasks, not across the board, and interpretable shortcuts can increase adversarial risk.
Data-Efficient Learning with Neural Programs
1 Pith paper cite this work. Polarity classification is still indexing.
abstract
Many computational tasks can be naturally expressed as a composition of a DNN followed by a program written in a traditional programming language or an API call to an LLM. We call such composites "neural programs" and focus on the problem of learning the DNN parameters when the training data consist of end-to-end input-output labels for the composite. When the program is written in a differentiable logic programming language, techniques from neurosymbolic learning are applicable, but in general, the learning for neural programs requires estimating the gradients of black-box components. We present an algorithm for learning neural programs, called ISED, that only relies on input-output samples of black-box components. For evaluation, we introduce new benchmarks that involve calls to modern LLMs such as GPT-4 and also consider benchmarks from the neurosymbolic learning literature. Our evaluation shows that for the latter benchmarks, ISED has comparable performance to state-of-the-art neurosymbolic frameworks. For the former, we use adaptations of prior work on gradient approximations of black-box components as a baseline, and show that ISED achieves comparable accuracy but in a more data- and sample-efficient manner.
citation-role summary
citation-polarity summary
fields
cs.AI 1years
2025 1verdicts
CONDITIONAL 1roles
background 1polarities
unclear 1representative citing papers
citing papers explorer
-
On the Promise for Assurance of Differentiable Neurosymbolic Reasoning Paradigms
A systematic comparison finds that differentiable neurosymbolic systems offer better assurance mainly in arithmetic-like reasoning tasks, not across the board, and interpretable shortcuts can increase adversarial risk.