Explores value-level and graph-level aggregation in multi-agent value-based argumentation and proposes aggregating rankings extracted from attack relations as a third method.
Title resolution pending
2 Pith papers cite this work. Polarity classification is still indexing.
2
Pith papers citing it
years
2019 2verdicts
UNVERDICTED 2representative citing papers
The authors adapt judgment aggregation to probabilistic opinions by generalizing classical functions and analyze desirable properties along with impossibility results.
citing papers explorer
-
Aggregation in Value-Based Argumentation Frameworks
Explores value-level and graph-level aggregation in multi-agent value-based argumentation and proposes aggregating rankings extracted from attack relations as a third method.
-
Aggregating Probabilistic Judgments
The authors adapt judgment aggregation to probabilistic opinions by generalizing classical functions and analyze desirable properties along with impossibility results.