ReasonVul deploys three LLM agents with independent analysis and structured debate to achieve 40% PairAcc and 72.52% F1 on PrimeVul, outperforming baselines by 81% in PairAcc.
Vulnllmeval: A framework for evaluating large language models in software vulnerability detection and patch- ing
4 Pith papers cite this work. Polarity classification is still indexing.
citation-role summary
citation-polarity summary
roles
background 1polarities
support 1representative citing papers
GLMTest integrates code property graphs and GNNs with LLMs to steer test case generation toward targeted branches, raising branch accuracy from 27.4% to 50.2% on the TestGenEval benchmark.
QuiLL is a new evaluation pipeline that uses optimized LLM prompts, dynamic in-context learning from an NVD vector store, and a novel accuracy-plus-reasoning metric to benchmark vulnerability detection in real code.
A literature review that categorizes anomaly detection methods in CPS, compares their strengths and weaknesses, and identifies research gaps.
citing papers explorer
-
Three Heads Are Better Than One: A Multi-perspective Reasoning Framework for Enhanced Vulnerability Detection
ReasonVul deploys three LLM agents with independent analysis and structured debate to achieve 40% PairAcc and 72.52% F1 on PrimeVul, outperforming baselines by 81% in PairAcc.
-
Program Structure-aware Language Models: Targeted Software Testing beyond Textual Semantics
GLMTest integrates code property graphs and GNNs with LLMs to steer test case generation toward targeted branches, raising branch accuracy from 27.4% to 50.2% on the TestGenEval benchmark.
-
QuiLL: An LLM-Based Vulnerability Assessment Framework for the Wild
QuiLL is a new evaluation pipeline that uses optimized LLM prompts, dynamic in-context learning from an NVD vector store, and a novel accuracy-plus-reasoning metric to benchmark vulnerability detection in real code.
-
Cyber-Physical Systems Security: A Comprehensive Review of Anomaly Detection Techniques
A literature review that categorizes anomaly detection methods in CPS, compares their strengths and weaknesses, and identifies research gaps.