Pith. sign in

Neural Generative Rhetorical Structure Parsing

1 Pith paper cite this work. Polarity classification is still indexing.

1 Pith paper citing it
abstract

Rhetorical structure trees have been shown to be useful for several document-level tasks including summarization and document classification. Previous approaches to RST parsing have used discriminative models; however, these are less sample efficient than generative models, and RST parsing datasets are typically small. In this paper, we present the first generative model for RST parsing. Our model is a document-level RNN grammar (RNNG) with a bottom-up traversal order. We show that, for our parser's traversal order, previous beam search algorithms for RNNGs have a left-branching bias which is ill-suited for RST parsing. We develop a novel beam search algorithm that keeps track of both structure- and word-generating actions without exhibiting this branching bias and results in absolute improvements of 6.8 and 2.9 on unlabelled and labelled F1 over previous algorithms. Overall, our generative model outperforms a discriminative model with the same features by 2.6 F1 points and achieves performance comparable to the state-of-the-art, outperforming all published parsers from a recent replication study that do not use additional training data.

fields

cs.CL 1

years

2025 1

verdicts

CONDITIONAL 1

representative citing papers

ESURF: Simple and Effective EDU Segmentation

cs.CL · 2025-01-13 · conditional · novelty 5.0

ESURF, a simple random forest with lexical and character n-gram features, reaches state-of-the-art EDU segmentation on RST-DT and modestly improves RST parsing.

citing papers explorer

Showing 1 of 1 citing paper.

  • ESURF: Simple and Effective EDU Segmentation cs.CL · 2025-01-13 · conditional · none · ref 21 · internal anchor

    ESURF, a simple random forest with lexical and character n-gram features, reaches state-of-the-art EDU segmentation on RST-DT and modestly improves RST parsing.