Pith. sign in

UltraEval: A Lightweight Platform for Flexible and Comprehensive Evaluation for LLMs

1 Pith paper cite this work. Polarity classification is still indexing.

1 Pith paper citing it
abstract

Evaluation is pivotal for refining Large Language Models (LLMs), pinpointing their capabilities, and guiding enhancements. The rapid development of LLMs calls for a lightweight and easy-to-use framework for swift evaluation deployment. However, considering various implementation details, developing a comprehensive evaluation platform is never easy. Existing platforms are often complex and poorly modularized, hindering seamless incorporation into research workflows. This paper introduces UltraEval, a user-friendly evaluation framework characterized by its lightweight nature, comprehensiveness, modularity, and efficiency. We identify and reimplement three core components of model evaluation (models, data, and metrics). The resulting composability allows for the free combination of different models, tasks, prompts, benchmarks, and metrics within a unified evaluation workflow. Additionally, UltraEval supports diverse models owing to a unified HTTP service and provides sufficient inference acceleration. UltraEval is now available for researchers publicly.

citation-role summary

background 1

citation-polarity summary

fields

cs.CL 1

years

2025 1

verdicts

REJECT 1

roles

background 1

polarities

background 1

representative citing papers

Behavioral Fingerprinting of Large Language Models

cs.CL · 2025-09-02 · reject · novelty 5.0

Reports a behavioral fingerprint framework for 18 LLMs, claiming reasoning converges while alignment behaviors diverge, but the measurements rest on a single unvalidated judge that is itself one of the graded models.

citing papers explorer

Showing 1 of 1 citing paper.

  • Behavioral Fingerprinting of Large Language Models cs.CL · 2025-09-02 · reject · none · ref 14 · internal anchor

    Reports a behavioral fingerprint framework for 18 LLMs, claiming reasoning converges while alignment behaviors diverge, but the measurements rest on a single unvalidated judge that is itself one of the graded models.