Pith. sign in

Training Deep Neural Networks with 8-bit Floating Point Numbers

1 Pith paper cite this work, alongside 207 external citations. Polarity classification is still indexing.

1 Pith paper citing it
207 external citations · Pith
abstract

The state-of-the-art hardware platforms for training Deep Neural Networks (DNNs) are moving from traditional single precision (32-bit) computations towards 16 bits of precision -- in large part due to the high energy efficiency and smaller bit storage associated with using reduced-precision representations. However, unlike inference, training with numbers represented with less than 16 bits has been challenging due to the need to maintain fidelity of the gradient computations during back-propagation. Here we demonstrate, for the first time, the successful training of DNNs using 8-bit floating point numbers while fully maintaining the accuracy on a spectrum of Deep Learning models and datasets. In addition to reducing the data and computation precision to 8 bits, we also successfully reduce the arithmetic precision for additions (used in partial product accumulation and weight updates) from 32 bits to 16 bits through the introduction of a number of key ideas including chunk-based accumulation and floating point stochastic rounding. The use of these novel techniques lays the foundation for a new generation of hardware training platforms with the potential for 2-4x improved throughput over today's systems.

citation-role summary

background 1

citation-polarity summary

fields

cs.CL 1

years

2025 1

verdicts

REJECT 1

roles

background 1

polarities

unclear 1

representative citing papers

Slimming Down LLMs Without Losing Their Minds

cs.CL · 2025-06-12 · reject · novelty 2.0

QLoRA fine-tuning on Alpaca data drops a 1B model's math accuracy from 33.5% to 3.7% and reduces MMLU-CS accuracy by 13 points, while HellaSwag stays flat.

citing papers explorer

Showing 1 of 1 citing paper.

  • Slimming Down LLMs Without Losing Their Minds cs.CL · 2025-06-12 · reject · none · ref 15 · internal anchor

    QLoRA fine-tuning on Alpaca data drops a 1B model's math accuracy from 33.5% to 3.7% and reduces MMLU-CS accuracy by 13 points, while HellaSwag stays flat.