The authors present a new 31-class, 8-source image classification dataset for federated learning and show that Fed-Cyclic and Fed-Star beat FedAvg and RingFed on it.
Multi-Center Federated Learning: Clients Clustering for Better Personalization
1 Pith paper cite this work. Polarity classification is still indexing.
abstract
Federated learning has received great attention for its capability to train a large-scale model in a decentralized manner without needing to access user data directly. It helps protect the users' private data from centralized collecting. Unlike distributed machine learning, federated learning aims to tackle non-IID data from heterogeneous sources in various real-world applications, such as those on smartphones. Existing federated learning approaches usually adopt a single global model to capture the shared knowledge of all users by aggregating their gradients, regardless of the discrepancy between their data distributions. However, due to the diverse nature of user behaviors, assigning users' gradients to different global models (i.e., centers) can better capture the heterogeneity of data distributions across users. Our paper proposes a novel multi-center aggregation mechanism for federated learning, which learns multiple global models from the non-IID user data and simultaneously derives the optimal matching between users and centers. We formulate the problem as a joint optimization that can be efficiently solved by a stochastic expectation maximization (EM) algorithm. Our experimental results on benchmark datasets show that our method outperforms several popular federated learning methods.
citation-role summary
citation-polarity summary
fields
cs.CV 1years
2025 1verdicts
CONDITIONAL 1roles
background 1polarities
unclear 1representative citing papers
citing papers explorer
-
Federated Learning for Commercial Image Sources
The authors present a new 31-class, 8-source image classification dataset for federated learning and show that Fed-Cyclic and Fed-Star beat FedAvg and RingFed on it.