YoCausal benchmark shows video diffusion models detect the arrow of time but lack genuine causal understanding relative to humans.
CounterVQA: Evaluating and improving counterfactual reasoning in vision-language models for video understanding
2 Pith papers cite this work. Polarity classification is still indexing.
abstract
Vision Language Models (VLMs) have recently shown significant advancements in video understanding, especially in feature alignment, event reasoning, and instruction-following tasks. However, their capability for counterfactual reasoning, inferring alternative outcomes under hypothetical conditions, remains underexplored. This capability is essential for robust video understanding, as it requires identifying underlying causal structures and reasoning about unobserved possibilities, rather than merely recognizing observed patterns. To systematically evaluate this capability, we introduce CounterVQA, a video-based benchmark featuring three progressive difficulty levels that assess different aspects of counterfactual reasoning. Through comprehensive evaluation of both state-of-the-art open-source and closed-source models, we uncover a substantial performance gap: while these models achieve reasonable accuracy on simple counterfactual questions, performance degrades significantly on complex multi-hop causal chains. To address these limitations, we develop a post-training method, CFGPT, that enhances a model's visual counterfactual reasoning ability by distilling its counterfactual reasoning capability from the language modality, yielding consistent improvements across all CounterVQA difficulty levels. Dataset and code will be further released.
fields
cs.CV 2years
2026 2verdicts
UNVERDICTED 2representative citing papers
VLMs achieve 53-97% on rearrangement planning but only 6-45% on occlusion and under 7% on reflections, with failures localized to visual token compression after the vision encoder.
citing papers explorer
-
YoCausal: How Far is Video Generation from World Model? A Causality Perspective
YoCausal benchmark shows video diffusion models detect the arrow of time but lack genuine causal understanding relative to humans.
-
Do Vision-Language Models Understand 3D Scenes or Just Catalogue Objects?
VLMs achieve 53-97% on rearrangement planning but only 6-45% on occlusion and under 7% on reflections, with failures localized to visual token compression after the vision encoder.