The manuscript is internally inconsistent: the abstract claims VLM art-attribution experiments, while the full text is an unrelated hybrid-search benchmark paper.
Investigating the Scalability of Approximate Sparse Retrieval Algorithms to Massive Datasets
1 Pith paper cite this work. Polarity classification is still indexing.
abstract
Learned sparse text embeddings have gained popularity due to their effectiveness in top-k retrieval and inherent interpretability. Their distributional idiosyncrasies, however, have long hindered their use in real-world retrieval systems. That changed with the recent development of approximate algorithms that leverage the distributional properties of sparse embeddings to speed up retrieval. Nonetheless, in much of the existing literature, evaluation has been limited to datasets with only a few million documents such as MSMARCO. It remains unclear how these systems behave on much larger datasets and what challenges lurk in larger scales. To bridge that gap, we investigate the behavior of state-of-the-art retrieval algorithms on massive datasets. We compare and contrast the recently-proposed Seismic and graph-based solutions adapted from dense retrieval. We extensively evaluate Splade embeddings of 138M passages from MsMarco-v2 and report indexing time and other efficiency and effectiveness metrics.
citation-role summary
citation-polarity summary
fields
cs.CY 1years
2025 1verdicts
UNVERDICTED 1roles
background 1polarities
unclear 1representative citing papers
citing papers explorer
-
Artificial Intelligence and Misinformation in Art: Can Vision Language Models Judge the Hand or the Machine Behind the Canvas?
The manuscript is internally inconsistent: the abstract claims VLM art-attribution experiments, while the full text is an unrelated hybrid-search benchmark paper.