Pith. sign in

Comparison of Methods Generalizing Max- and Average-Pooling

1 Pith paper cite this work. Polarity classification is still indexing.

1 Pith paper citing it
abstract

Max- and average-pooling are the most popular pooling methods for downsampling in convolutional neural networks. In this paper, we compare different pooling methods that generalize both max- and average-pooling. Furthermore, we propose another method based on a smooth approximation of the maximum function and put it into context with related methods. For the comparison, we use a VGG16 image classification network and train it on a large dataset of natural high-resolution images (Google Open Images v5). The results show that none of the more sophisticated methods perform significantly better in this classification task than standard max- or average-pooling.

citation-role summary

background 1

citation-polarity summary

fields

eess.SP 1

years

2025 1

verdicts

CONDITIONAL 1

roles

background 1

polarities

unclear 1

representative citing papers

citing papers explorer

Showing 1 of 1 citing paper.