Random forests reproduce simulated halo gas density profiles to roughly 80-90% accuracy, and Sobol analysis of those forests ranks halo mass and central gas mass as the dominant predictors across EAGLE, IllustrisTNG, and Simba.
C., Lo K., 2023b, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stad2266, https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023MNRAS.525.1167A 525
1 Pith paper cite this work, alongside 4 external citations. Polarity classification is still indexing.
1
Pith paper citing it
4
external citations · OpenAlex
fields
astro-ph.GA 1years
2025 1verdicts
CONDITIONAL 1representative citing papers
citing papers explorer
-
Interpretable machine learning of halo gas density profiles: a sensitivity analysis of cosmological hydrodynamical simulations
Random forests reproduce simulated halo gas density profiles to roughly 80-90% accuracy, and Sobol analysis of those forests ranks halo mass and central gas mass as the dominant predictors across EAGLE, IllustrisTNG, and Simba.