A large-scale benchmark shows that leading multimodal language models still underperform expert humans at verifying climate claims from scientific charts.
COVID-Fact: Fact Extraction and Verification of Real-World Claims on COVID-19 Pandemic
1 Pith paper cite this work. Polarity classification is still indexing.
abstract
We introduce a FEVER-like dataset COVID-Fact of $4,086$ claims concerning the COVID-19 pandemic. The dataset contains claims, evidence for the claims, and contradictory claims refuted by the evidence. Unlike previous approaches, we automatically detect true claims and their source articles and then generate counter-claims using automatic methods rather than employing human annotators. Along with our constructed resource, we formally present the task of identifying relevant evidence for the claims and verifying whether the evidence refutes or supports a given claim. In addition to scientific claims, our data contains simplified general claims from media sources, making it better suited for detecting general misinformation regarding COVID-19. Our experiments indicate that COVID-Fact will provide a challenging testbed for the development of new systems and our approach will reduce the costs of building domain-specific datasets for detecting misinformation.
fields
cs.CL 1years
2025 1verdicts
CONDITIONAL 1representative citing papers
citing papers explorer
-
ClimateViz: A Benchmark for Statistical Reasoning and Fact Verification on Scientific Charts
A large-scale benchmark shows that leading multimodal language models still underperform expert humans at verifying climate claims from scientific charts.