Assigning personas to Chinese LLMs amplifies toxic output relative to default behavior, while refusal rates shift systematically with persona gender and target social group.
Toxic Bias: Perspective API Misreads German as More Toxic
1 Pith paper cite this work. Polarity classification is still indexing.
abstract
Proprietary public APIs play a crucial and growing role as research tools among social scientists. Among such APIs, Google's machine learning-based Perspective API is extensively utilized for assessing the toxicity of social media messages, providing both an important resource for researchers and automatic content moderation. However, this paper exposes an important bias in Perspective API concerning German language text. Through an in-depth examination of several datasets, we uncover intrinsic language biases within the multilingual model of Perspective API. We find that the toxicity assessment of German content produces significantly higher toxicity levels than other languages. This finding is robust across various translations, topics, and data sources, and has significant consequences for both research and moderation strategies that rely on Perspective API. For instance, we show that, on average, four times more tweets and users would be moderated when using the German language compared to their English translation. Our findings point to broader risks associated with the widespread use of proprietary APIs within the computational social sciences.
citation-role summary
citation-polarity summary
fields
cs.CY 1years
2025 1verdicts
CONDITIONAL 1roles
background 1polarities
unclear 1representative citing papers
citing papers explorer
-
Evaluating Chinese Large Language Models: The Influence of Persona Assignment on Stereotypes and Safeguards
Assigning personas to Chinese LLMs amplifies toxic output relative to default behavior, while refusal rates shift systematically with persona gender and target social group.