The survey structures agentic reasoning for LLMs into foundational, self-evolving, and collective multi-agent layers while distinguishing in-context orchestration from post-training optimization and reviewing applications across domains.
Learning to use tools via cooperative and interactive agents.arXiv preprint arXiv:2403.03031, 2024
3 Pith papers cite this work. Polarity classification is still indexing.
citation-role summary
citation-polarity summary
fields
cs.AI 3verdicts
UNVERDICTED 3roles
background 2polarities
background 2representative citing papers
A survey that taxonomizes threats to agentic AI, reviews benchmarks and evaluation methods, discusses technical and governance defenses, and identifies open challenges.
A survey of emerging AI agent architectures that organizes single and multi-agent designs around reasoning, planning, tool use, communication, and reflection phases.
citing papers explorer
-
Agentic Reasoning for Large Language Models
The survey structures agentic reasoning for LLMs into foundational, self-evolving, and collective multi-agent layers while distinguishing in-context orchestration from post-training optimization and reviewing applications across domains.
-
Agentic AI Security: Threats, Defenses, Evaluation, and Open Challenges
A survey that taxonomizes threats to agentic AI, reviews benchmarks and evaluation methods, discusses technical and governance defenses, and identifies open challenges.
-
The Landscape of Emerging AI Agent Architectures for Reasoning, Planning, and Tool Calling: A Survey
A survey of emerging AI agent architectures that organizes single and multi-agent designs around reasoning, planning, tool use, communication, and reflection phases.