Pith. sign in

Almost Group Envy-free Allocation of Indivisible Goods and Chores

1 Pith paper cite this work. Polarity classification is still indexing.

1 Pith paper citing it
abstract

We consider a multi-agent resource allocation setting in which an agent's utility may decrease or increase when an item is allocated. We take the group envy-freeness concept that is well-established in the literature and present stronger and relaxed versions that are especially suitable for the allocation of indivisible items. Of particular interest is a concept called group envy-freeness up to one item (GEF1). We then present a clear taxonomy of the fairness concepts. We study which fairness concepts guarantee the existence of a fair allocation under which preference domain. For two natural classes of additive utilities, we design polynomial-time algorithms to compute a GEF1 allocation. We also prove that checking whether a given allocation satisfies GEF1 is coNP-complete when there are either only goods, only chores or both.

fields

econ.TH 1

years

2026 1

verdicts

UNVERDICTED 1

representative citing papers

Consistency, unanimity, and the Borda rule in social ranking

econ.TH · 2026-05-18 · unverdicted · novelty 6.0

The authors characterize a new Borda-type social ranking solution (SRS) that satisfies weak consistency, closeness to unanimity under linear symmetric domains, neutrality, and independence of perfunctory participation.

citing papers explorer

Showing 1 of 1 citing paper.

  • Consistency, unanimity, and the Borda rule in social ranking econ.TH · 2026-05-18 · unverdicted · none · ref 143 · internal anchor

    The authors characterize a new Borda-type social ranking solution (SRS) that satisfies weak consistency, closeness to unanimity under linear symmetric domains, neutrality, and independence of perfunctory participation.