Reasoning-augmented LLMs are on average about 3 points more robust to prompt attacks, but category-level results flip this, including a 32-point higher success rate for tree-of-attacks jailbreaks.
Gandalf the Red: Adaptive Security for LLMs
1 Pith paper cite this work. Polarity classification is still indexing.
abstract
Current evaluations of defenses against prompt attacks in large language model (LLM) applications often overlook two critical factors: the dynamic nature of adversarial behavior and the usability penalties imposed on legitimate users by restrictive defenses. We propose D-SEC (Dynamic Security Utility Threat Model), which explicitly separates attackers from legitimate users, models multi-step interactions, and expresses the security-utility in an optimizable form. We further address the shortcomings in existing evaluations by introducing Gandalf, a crowd-sourced, gamified red-teaming platform designed to generate realistic, adaptive attack. Using Gandalf, we collect and release a dataset of 279k prompt attacks. Complemented by benign user data, our analysis reveals the interplay between security and utility, showing that defenses integrated in the LLM (e.g., system prompts) can degrade usability even without blocking requests. We demonstrate that restricted application domains, defense-in-depth, and adaptive defenses are effective strategies for building secure and useful LLM applications.
citation-role summary
citation-polarity summary
fields
cs.AI 1years
2025 1verdicts
CONDITIONAL 1roles
background 1polarities
unclear 1representative citing papers
citing papers explorer
-
Weakest Link in the Chain: Security Vulnerabilities in Advanced Reasoning Models
Reasoning-augmented LLMs are on average about 3 points more robust to prompt attacks, but category-level results flip this, including a 32-point higher success rate for tree-of-attacks jailbreaks.