Analysis of 69,498 comments finds human-influencer discourse compact and stability-centered around low neuroticism and positive sentiment, while virtual-influencer discourse is more semantically dispersed, supports multiple regimes, and contains a distinct artificial-identity region with higher nega
Journal of Experimental and Theoretical Artificial Intelligence 14(2–3), 189–216 (2002)
1 Pith paper cite this work. Polarity classification is still indexing.
1
Pith paper citing it
fields
cs.CY 1years
2026 1verdicts
UNVERDICTED 1representative citing papers
citing papers explorer
-
Real Talk, Virtual Faces: Symbolic-Semantic Discourse Geometry of Virtual and Human Influencer Audiences
Analysis of 69,498 comments finds human-influencer discourse compact and stability-centered around low neuroticism and positive sentiment, while virtual-influencer discourse is more semantically dispersed, supports multiple regimes, and contains a distinct artificial-identity region with higher nega