A new 500-post benchmark of naturally occurring phonetic cloaking shows LLMs detect such Chinese offensive language with F1 at most 0.672, and Pinyin-augmented prompting partially repairs the gap.
Exploring Multimodal Challenges in Toxic Chinese Detection: Taxonomy, Benchmark, and Findings
1 Pith paper cite this work. Polarity classification is still indexing.
abstract
Detecting toxic content using language models is important but challenging. While large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated strong performance in understanding Chinese, recent studies show that simple character substitutions in toxic Chinese text can easily confuse the state-of-the-art (SOTA) LLMs. In this paper, we highlight the multimodal nature of Chinese language as a key challenge for deploying LLMs in toxic Chinese detection. First, we propose a taxonomy of 3 perturbation strategies and 8 specific approaches in toxic Chinese content. Then, we curate a dataset based on this taxonomy, and benchmark 9 SOTA LLMs (from both the US and China) to assess if they can detect perturbed toxic Chinese text. Additionally, we explore cost-effective enhancement solutions like in-context learning (ICL) and supervised fine-tuning (SFT). Our results reveal two important findings. (1) LLMs are less capable of detecting perturbed multimodal Chinese toxic contents. (2) ICL or SFT with a small number of perturbed examples may cause the LLMs "overcorrect'': misidentify many normal Chinese contents as toxic.
fields
cs.CL 1years
2025 1verdicts
CONDITIONAL 1representative citing papers
citing papers explorer
-
Lost in Pronunciation: Detecting Chinese Offensive Language Disguised by Phonetic Cloaking Replacement
A new 500-post benchmark of naturally occurring phonetic cloaking shows LLMs detect such Chinese offensive language with F1 at most 0.672, and Pinyin-augmented prompting partially repairs the gap.