pith. sign in

Simultaneous Explanation of the $R_K$ and $R(D^{(*)})$ Puzzles

2 Pith papers cite this work. Polarity classification is still indexing.

2 Pith papers citing it
abstract

At present, there are several hints of lepton flavor non-universality. The LHCb Collaboration has measured $R_K\equiv{\cal B}(B^+ \to K^+ \mu^+ \mu^-)/{\cal B}(B^+ \to K^+ e^+ e^-)$, and the BaBar Collaboration has measured $R(D^{(*)}) \equiv {\cal B}({\bar B} \to D^{(*)+} \tau^- {\bar\nu}_\tau) / {\cal B}({\bar B} \to D^{(*)+} \ell^- {\bar\nu}_\ell)$ ($\ell = e,\mu$). In all cases, the experimental results differ from the standard model predictions by 2-3$\sigma$. Recently, an explanation of the $R_K$ puzzle was proposed in which new physics (NP) generates a neutral-current operator involving only third-generation particles. Now, assuming the scale of NP is much larger than the weak scale, this NP operator must be made invariant under the full $SU(3)_C \times SU(2)_L \times U(1)_Y$ gauge group. In this Letter, we note that, when this is done, a new charged-current operator can appear, and this can explain the $R(D^{(*)})$ puzzle. A more precise measurement of the double ratio $R(D)/R(D^*)$ can rule out this model.

fields

hep-ph 2

years

2024 1 2019 1

verdicts

UNVERDICTED 2

representative citing papers

Combined explanation of the B-anomalies

hep-ph · 2019-06-30 · unverdicted · novelty 4.0

Four models for combined explanation of B anomalies are tested with general couplings, excluding three and constraining the fourth.

citing papers explorer

Showing 2 of 2 citing papers.